THE MEDICAL
LABORATORIES CONSPIRACY
I believe that there are many Medical
Doctors who honor their Hippocratic
oath. However, like in every profession and trade, there
are some who are willing to overlook laboratory discrepancies,
or have become too dependent on
laboratory results. In fact, most doctors do not have a
microscope at home or in their office, with the exception of
pathologists. That does not bother me. However, when a
professional, from a different profession (such as engineering,
law, philosophy, education, etc), who happens to be an
intelligent microscopist, shows them empirical evidence
of a pathogenic infection, some of the MDs, choose to ignore
them, in favor of Lab results. Even ignoring the fact that the
laboratories do NOT provide them with micrographs of the blood,
urine, or feces, that they examined. That does bother
me, and I consider it an insult to the intelligence, the
dedication, and proficiency of the microscopist. Don't doctors
know how to identify certain pathogens in a micrograph? Is this
due to a deficiency in their medical education? Are they not
aware of the fact that some Labs could be corrupted? Or the fact
that there is a certain level of incompetence and/or greed in
some Labs? Or are, some doctors involved in the laboratories
conspiracy?
A few decades ago, feces from a small girl, that had been
contaminated with pin worms from her contaminated cat, was sent
to a Lab. The pin worms could be seen moving on top of the
collected feces. But the Lab results were negative. At that
time, I thought that it was just laboratory incompetence.
However, because 3 persons had seen the parasites moving on top
of the feces, the doctor had to ignore the negative lab result
and wrote a prescription for Vermox (Mebendazole).
Decades later, I suspected that I had some microscopic
intestinal worms. So I went to a Dr and told him that a couple
of Mebendazole tablets will eliminate them. He became upset, and
told me "that's not how it works" (exact quotation). He
referred me to an infectious disease specialist, who would not
see me unless I first had a Lab test me for parasites. And, the
Lab results were negative. So I learned how to do a culture for
parasites, and how to do an ass tape capture. Then I search for
parasites in the culture and the tape tests, using my
microscope, and microscope digital camera. In the culture, I
found hook worm eggs and a hook worm that had grown in the
culture. In the tape test, I found wipworms. I was able to buy
Mebendazole from another country. And the worms were eliminated.
It was then, that I realized that there must be a Mebendazole Conspiracy.
And now, I believe the conspiracy has expanded. The laboratories
in Florida (Quest, Lab Corp, and the VA health care system) seem
to be incapable (or unwilling) to find the presence of Leishmania, Rickettsia
or Plasmodiums (such as malaria), . In fact, when they test for
malaria, they use blood from the veins (called peripheral
blood), instead of capillary blood as recommended
by the CDC . In fact, they DO NOT follow any of
the CDC recommendations when collecting blood for the detection
of certain parasites.
It would be difficult, but not impossible, to corrupt hundreds
or thousands of doctors. However, it is a lot easier for the Medical
Industrial Complex (MIC) to corrupt 1 or 2 Laboratories
chains. So by not reporting certain parasites to the doctors,
the doctors do not know the cause of the symptoms. And
therefore, will treat one or more symptoms. Symptoms that would
disappear if the doctors (or nurse practitioners) would treat
the pathogen that is causing the symptoms.
I am sure that there are a few doctors (a minority, I hope) who
believe that "treating the symptoms" is more profitable
than "treating the cause of the symptoms". This, of course, is
contrary to the Hippocratic
oath (from medical school).
Why would Labs not identify Rickettsia, aside from the fact that
it is usually difficult to detect in the blood ? See The
Rickettsia Conspiracy.
New Note:
I recently read, somewhere in the Web, that Doctors
(with the exception of Pathologist) are not allow to use any
data acquired from their own microscope (if they have one in
their office) in order to make a diagnosis. I have not been
able to verify if this true. However, if it is true, it
indicates the forced dependency
on laboratory results.
RETURN