THE TRUTH ABOUT CANNABIS
( HEMP, MARIJUANA )
Revised: Dec.
2025
I am presenting here,
overwhelming scientific evidence of the many medical
applications of this wonderful medicinal herb. No other
plant has as many medical patents as cannabis does.
I am NOT advocating the smoking
of this medicinal herb. I am against the smoking of ANY
substance. We should eat (not smoke) this plant. Or use a
vaporizer. Or extract the necessary chemicals from it,
depending on what illness we intent to treat.
Here is a link to a study done by
John Hopkins University and the Philadelphia Veterans
Affairs Medical Center:
Prescription
drugs overdose deaths lower in states with legal medical
marijuana
The Journal of the American
Medical Association (JAMA) published:
Medical
Cannabis Laws and Opioid Analgesic Overdose Mortality in
the United States (1999-2010)
The above results are due to the
fact that Cannabis amplifies the pain
blocking effect of opioids, aspirin
and ibuprofen
. Therefore, a smaller quantity of the opiod,
aspirin or ibuprofen can be used, if combined with cannabis,
to block the same amount of pain.
In the essay "CANNABIS: The Good,
The Bad, And
The Ugly" (See link at the bottom of this page). I
give a brief description (and Web links) to some of the
medical patents that have already been awarded to scientist
and organizations such as the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. These patents are not awarded without prior
medical or scientific studies that
prove the claims made in the patents. I also mention the
problems caused by prohibition.
Here is a map of the U.S.A. showing
the current status of Cannabis in the different states. Noticed that there are now 24 states & Wash. D.C.
that have legalized cannabis for recreational use. And
in all 50 states it is
legal for medicinal purposes.

It is only a matter of time, before
the politicians (some corrupted, some just idiots) at the
federal level (Wash. D.C.) have to comply with the will of the
people and end this prohibition.
Since the 1970s, when the corrupted president Nixon (who would
have been impeached had he not resigned) appointed the National
Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (also known as
the Shafer Commission), it has been known that cannabis is
less addictive and less harmful than alcohol and tobacco. The
recommendations of the study were ignored by the Nixon
administration, and their results were not allowed to be
published. Why? The secret Nixon Tapes (no longer secret) show
the true personality of Nixon, a delusional paranoid that
feared and hated Jews, hippies, liberals, socialist,
communist, African Americans, democrats, and anyone who used
any narcotic other than alcohol, tobacco, or coffee . What I
don't fully understand is, why does the current government
continue his "war on drugs" policies? knowing that he was a
dishonest liar and a delusional paranoid. And having a lot of
new data, not available in 1970, regarding the medical uses of
Cannabis. And knowing that since the 1970s Cannabis has been
sold legally in Netherlands'
Coffeeshops and the per
capita consumption of cannabis, there, is lower than in
the USA. Some members of the DEA and other government
officials must be getting a lot of payola
from drug traffickers. Because it is the drug traffickers who
have the most to loose if Cannabis is made legal.
Nixon created the DEA and launched the "War on
Drugs" that has not reduced the used of illegal drugs,
has cost tax payers more than a trillion dollars, has created
billionaires and millionaires out of drug traffickers, and has
ruined the lives of millions. But the worst part, is that by
including cannabis in schedule I, along with the "real"
harmful drugs, we have been deprived of the use of one of the
best (if not the best) medicinal herb nature (or God) has
created (by evolution or design).
Here is an illustration of the medical properties of some of
the cannabinoids.

There is a new documentary named "Weed The
People" in Netflix that shows the results of two recent
medical studies that shows in vitro
empirical evidence that CBG
(Cannabigerol)
promotes cancer cell apoptosis
(certain cancer cells kill themselves) and cancer tumors in
rats are significantly shrunk when CBG is added to their
diet. In fact, as far back as 1996 ( 1996
medical study ) it was known that CBG has antitumor
properties. CBGA is a precursor to CBDA, CBCA, & THCA.
And CBG does not make us high. The hemp (industrial hemp)
plants that are now legal, have a high concentration of CBG,
but almost no THC. And the medical marijuana that has high
THC content have very low CBG content.
YouTube no longer plays the original "The True History of
Marijuana". They claim that the BBC claims copyright to parts
of it.
Here is a link to a film made by the US Government in 1942 to
promote the growing of hemp (cannabis).
HEMP FOR
VICTORY
And here is a Wikipedia description of the "Hemp
for Victory" film.
A little history regarding the
demonizing of Cannabis:
The demonizing
of cannabis was started by people in the Alcohol business,
after prohibition, because Cannabis was a safer and less
expensive alternative to alcohol. Then DuPont and William
Randolph Hearst intensified the demonizing in the 40s.
DuPond invented Nylon in 1945 and wanted to use Nylon in ropes
and other products, but did not want to compete with hemp,
since hemp production had gone up during the war, and hemp
ropes were very cheap. W. R. Hearst was using, for his many
newspapers, paper made from wood pulp. He owned interest in
paper mills and in the plantations that provided the wood
pulp. Therefore he did not want competition from paper made
from hemp. He also owned DuPont stocks.
Marijuana was never made illegal by an amendment, like alcohol
was (during prohibition), instead, The
Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 was used, by the federal
government, as the law that gave them power to arrest people
for possession of marijuana. Until 1969, when Professor Timothy
Leary told the Supreme Court that the Act violated the
Fifth amendment because it required self incrimination. So the
Supreme Court ruled the Act unconstitutional (Leary
v. United States). The Federal Government, as usual, in
violation of the 10th amendment, did not want to relinquish
the power to control cannabis, to the states. So the crooked
president Richard Nixon & the idiot Attorney General John
Mitchell, in 1969, created the Control
Substances Act that Congress Passed and Nixon signed
into law in 1970. They also created the DEA and the National
Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (later known as the Shafer
Commission). Marijuana was placed in Schedule I,
temporarily, pending the 2 year study by the Shafer
Commission. In 1972 the commission, after completing it's
study & research, reported that Marijuana should be
decriminalized and removed from schedule I. However, Nixon
refused and ignored the recommendations of the commission.
Perhaps because he was ignorant besides being paranoid and
dishonest, or perhaps he was trying to protect the illegal
marijuana trade, because some of his friends were making
millions from it.
Since 1972 we (the honest people) have been trying
to remove Cannabis from schedule I.
But the FDA (Fools & Dummies Administration), the DEA, and
the Justice Department (may be it should be called "the
Injustice Department") continue to deny the removal, against
the will of the majority of the people and the majority of the
states, and against the advise of scientists and doctors.
After all the U.S.patents (and patents from other countries)
that have been granted for the medical use of cannabis, and
all the testimony from people who have been healed or
medically helped by the use of cannabis. And all the medical
studies done in the US and in many other countries, only a delusional
mentally challenged person or a corrupted official (who is
getting money from the mafia, or from pharmaceutical
companies) would believe that there is no medical use for
cannabis and that it must stay in Schedule
I.
How come Marinol (Pharmaceutically created (synthetic) THC)
has been approved by the FDA for medical use, but not "real"
THC from the cannabis plant? And CBD (cannabidiol) was in
schedule V if sold by GW
Pharmaceuticals but no one else could sell CBD.
This was prove of the corruption at the FDA. This has changed.
The latest farm bill legalized industrial hemp
(cannabis sativa with less than 0.3% THC.
THC is the molecule than causes the euphoric high that the
government does not want us to feel, probably because people
might like it better than alcohol or tobacco. Therefore, we
can now buy products that contain CBD (from internet sites or
some local stores).
A very interesting fact, is that world leaders and
intellectuals are becoming aware that the "War on
Drugs" is a big failure. And are realizing that
legalization, regulation, and prevention thru education (like
we do with alcohol) is superior to prohibition. Here are links
that verify what I just stated, in this paragraph:
Global
Commission on Drug Policy (GCDP) (2011).
You can download the GCDP report, in English, Spanish, or
Portuguese, from:
Commission
of World Leaders Urges End to Failed Drug War.
Latin
American Commission on Drugs and Democracy favors
decriminalization.
I really feel the need to make a comment on Ex-Attorney
General Jeff Sessions' testimony in Congress. He said and I
quote "Good people don't smoke marijuana". What a STUPID
statement to make. I bed he drinks alcohol, a narcotic that
kills more people and causes more financial harm that any
other narcotic (legal or illegal). And probably he or some of
his family smoke tobacco (an addictive protoplasmic poison
that has no medical use). And when asked why he has not
approved the sixteen request (from research institutions) for
medical studies related to cannabis, he said that "one study
is enough". I guest he did not study much science in college.
And I am sure he never studied Logic. I am glad Trump
fired him. I am not surprised that mentally challenged
prejudice Alabamans are elected or confirmed to a high office
in the federal government. What I find illogical is that
medical studies require the approval of Liberal Arts majors in
the Justice Department. Shouldn't that responsibility be given
to the Surgeon General, or the National Institute of Health,
or the CDC?
Please, "feed your brain" by
reading this essay (click on the link bellow):
Cannabis: The Good, The
Bad, And The Ugly
RETURN